Legal Opinion

State v. Bonner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] We are called upon to examine whether imposing the longest possible penitentiary sentence for burglary upon a developmentally disabled offender, whose accomplices received probation, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We conclude that under the particular circumstances of this case, the burglary sentence was grossly disproportionate to the offense committed and was thus cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment. We reverse and remand for resentencing on the burglary offense. On the other hand, we affirm the sentence for statutory rape.

FACTS

Elf 2.] Jonathan…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. ChippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. BuchholdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API