State v. Bonner
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] We are called upon to examine whether imposing the longest possible penitentiary sentence for burglary upon a developmentally disabled offender, whose accomplices received probation, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We conclude that under the particular circumstances of this case, the burglary sentence was grossly disproportionate to the offense committed and was thus cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment. We reverse and remand for resentencing on the burglary offense. On the other hand, we affirm the sentence for statutory rape.
FACTS
Elf 2.] Jonathan…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. ChippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. BuchholdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.