Legal Opinion

State v. Nelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] At inquiry in this case is whether a trial court must follow fundamental procedures for conducting a jury trial. Although it provided complete written instructions to the jury, the court at the close of the evidence failed to read all the instructions as required by law, including those on the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof. The court also sent out thirteen jurors to deliberate, over the strenuous objections of the State and with the uninformed consent of the pro se defendant. We conclude that these actions created plain error, cumulatively…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. First Premier Bank v. Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. KarlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BowkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API