Legal Opinion
Robinson-Podoll v. Harmelink, Fox, & Ravnsborg Law Office
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 2020No. 28429PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
#28429-aff in pt & rev in pt-SRJ
2020 S.D. 5
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** JILL ROBINSON-PODOLL f/k/a JILL ROBINSON-KUCHTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HARMELINK, FOX & RAVNSBORG Defendants, Third-Party LAW OFFICE and WANDA L. HOWEY-FOX, Plaintiffs and Appellees. v. YANKTON COUNTY, Third-Party Defendant and SOUTH DAKOTA Appellee. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT YANKTON COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA **** THE HONORABLE JOHN PEKAS Judge **** CASEY W. FIDELER of Christopherson, Anderson, Paulson & Fideler, LLP Sioux Falls, South Dakota ROBERT J. ROHL…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ries v. Jm Custom Homes, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Slota v. ImhoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Paul v. BathurstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Barr v. ColeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Rebecca Nichols v. James Swindoll and Chuck GibsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.