Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Coleman

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1998No. S-8004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal concerns attorney’s fees in a custody case. A Michigan court divorced the parents, but left the issue of custody to the Fairbanks superior court, which had jurisdiction over their children. That court held a custody trial, but, just before final arguments, the mother agreed to let the father have custody in return for stipulations about the children’s care. Neither party mentioned attorney’s fees in reporting this oral settlement to the court. Ten days later, the mother successfully moved the court to award her roughly half of her actual fees.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lone Wolf v. Lone WolfAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. BarthAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ogar v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London v. B3, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Easley v. EasleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Hodge v. SorbaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API