Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London v. B3, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 21, 2011No. 108,268. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WM. C. HETHERINGTON, JR., Presiding Judge.
T1 Defendants/Appellants B3, Inc. (B3) and NRS Consulting Engineers (NRS) appeal entry of an order sustaining a Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London (Lloyds) in Lloyd's suit for a declaratory judgment. The trial court's finding the Total Pollution exclusion in an insurance policy issued by Lloyds applied to bar coverage for liability and damages claimed in a lawsuit against NRS, B3, and Defendant The Mill Creek Public Works Authority and Lloyd's was entitled to judgment as a matter of law is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Brown v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Above it All Roofing & Constr., Inc. v. Sec. Nat'l Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018
- Bryant v. Sagamore InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2014
- Star Insurance v. Bear Productions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2013