Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Barth

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2000No. S-9184PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I, INTRODUCTION

Marla Sanders appeals the superior court's denial of Civil Rule 82 attorney's fees in a child support action that settled. Marla claims that she was entitled to the fees as the prevailing party to the litigation and that the superior court erred in applying the divorce exception to Rule 82.

While we agree that it was error to apply the divorce exception to a case that does not closely resemble a divorce action, we nevertheless hold that any error was harmless because the absence of any fees provision in the settlement agreement precludes Marla from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lone Wolf v. Lone WolfAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Osterkamp v. StilesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. DeSalvo v. BryantAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McDonald v. TrihubAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API