Legal Opinion

Cogswell v. Eichenberger

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 1985No. C8-84-2250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellants Roy and Lowanna Cogswell appeal the decision of the trial court refusing to give requested jury instructions and to provide a special interrogatory verdict on negligence. Appellants argue that the motions were, in effect, a motion for amended pleadings and that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant the amendment. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants had homeowner’s insurance with State Farm Fire and Casualty Company for many years. On October 28, 1980, appellant Lowanna Cogswell telephoned respondent Wayne Eichenberger, the agent to whom the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Antonson v. EkvallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Pierce v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Brandenberg v. Equity Co-Operative ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Superwood Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Crown Holding Corp. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Goodrich v. McCannelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API