Legal Opinion

Brandenberg v. Equity Co-Operative Exchange

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1924No. 23,972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment non obstante or a new trial, after verdict for plaintiff.

The action is by the father in behalf of his son, Paul, a minor, to recover for injuries sustained by Paul when a manlift in defendant’s grain elevator at Sanborn, North Dakota, fell with him. The recovery was based on the theory that the lift was an attractive and dangerous plaything for children and also that defendant’s manager, Ferhagen, in charge of the elevator, negligently permitted children to operate the same, knowing it to be dangerous and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kefee v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  2. Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. O'Malley v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Znidersich v. Minnesota Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Berg v. B. B. Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Erickson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Drew v. LettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Cogswell v. EichenbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API