Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. McCannel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1986No. C9-85-1277Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This appeal is from an order directing a verdict for respondent and judgment entered April 19, 1985. The trial court determined that appellant failed to establish a causal connection between certain undisclosed risks encountered during cataract surgery and appellant’s ultimate loss of vision. We affirm.

FACTS

This medical malpractice case involves claims of negligent care and treatment by respondent Malcolm McCannel, M.D. and defendant Donald P. LeWin, M.D. and negligent nondisclosure of risks arising from cataract surgery performed on appellant Maude Goodrich’s left…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reinhardt v. ColtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Plutshack Ex Rel. Plutshack v. University of Minnesota HospitalsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Pierce v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Cogswell v. EichenbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API