Legal Opinion
Bowen v. Superwood Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 10, 1986No. CX-86-441PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant, Kathleen Bowen, filed a verified charge with the Human Rights Commission pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1 (1984) of the Minnesota Human Rights Act. She alleged that her employer, respondent Superwood Corporation, discriminated against her on the basis of gender by paying her less than a male employee whom she alleged had previously performed the same job. The Human Rights Commission determined that no probable cause existed to substantiate the charges.
Despite the Commission’s ruling, appellant brought a district court action against respondent alleging…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Klink v. Ramsey County Ex Rel. ZachariasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Kolstad v. Fairway Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987