Legal Opinion

Clay v. Crooks Industries

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1974No. 11401PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Claimant John Melvin Clay has appealed from the order of the Industrial Commission denying him unemployment compensation benefits for which he applied after leaving a job with Crooks Industries. Clay had been employed by Crooks Industries at various times over a fifteen year period, but he had last begun work for it during August of 1971 when he was hired, according to the testimony of John Crooks, the owner of Crooks Industries, as a “shop engineer” whose “duties were of a much higher nature than that of a welder or machinist because of his inventive mind.” Clay, who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phipps v. Boise Street Car Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Saulls v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Levesque v. Hi-Boy Meats, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Roby v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Booth v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Avery v. B & B RENTAL TOILETSIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Laundry v. Franciscan Health Care CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Weston v. Gritman Memorial HospitalIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API