Legal Opinion

Saulls v. Employment Security Agency

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1963No. 9125PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Claimant, Everett L. Saulls, prior to the fall of 1960 had been employed as a ditch rider for 16 seasons by the Fort Hall Agency, Bureau of Indian Affairs, hereinafter referred to as the Agency. The Bureau of Indian Affairs will be referred to as the Bureau. During this time, when no work was available for ditch riders, they were “laid off” by a procedure known as “reduction in force,” and were eligible for unemployment benefits. Once laid off by this procedure, it was necessary to reprocess the individual when he returned to work.

In the fall of 1960, the Bureau proposed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Feehan v. KendrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. National Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Neumeyer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Roby v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Weaver v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ellis v. Northwest Fruit & ProduceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Clay v. Crooks IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bistline v. EberleIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API