Legal Opinion

Mabey v. Kay Peterson Construction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1984No. 18338PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Defendant Kay Peterson Construction Company appeals from an adverse judgment contending (1) it was error to award any damages to the plaintiffs, and (2) defendant was awarded an insufficient amount on its counterclaim after the court reformed the contract between the parties.

Plaintiffs Thomas C. Mabey and Louise S. Mabey, his wife, purchased a “spec" house from the defendant construction company. Mr. Mabey, an engineer, had participated in its construction, as well as in the development of other houses built by the construction company. The Mabeys had expressed an interest in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. General Insurance Co. of America v. Carnicero Dynasty Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kesler Ex Rel. Kesler v. RogersUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Clayton v. Crossroads Equipment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Phillips v. JCM Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Neeley v. KelschUtah Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Peterson v. Coca-Cola USAUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Guardian State Bank v. StanglUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Cantamar, L.L.C. v. ChampagneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API