Legal Opinion

Cantamar, L.L.C. v. Champagne

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 3, 2006No. Case No. 20050778-CAPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendants Carlton J. Champagne, Lon E. Williams, and Data Systems International, Inc. (collectively, DSI) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Plaintiff The Cantamar, LLC (Cantamar). On appeal, DSI maintains the trial court erred in concluding the contract between the parties was unambiguous and integrated as a matter of law. DSI also argues the trial court erred in not addressing the existence of a condition precedent and in declining to consider DSI’s claim of fraudulent inducement. Finally, DSI contends that genuine issues of material fact exist…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Bennett v. HuishCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  3. Sabertooth, LLC v. Simons (In Re Sabertooth, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Burningham v. Westgate Resorts, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API