Neeley v. Kelsch
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
The plaintiff, hereafter Neeley, brought this action to quiet title to certain real property in Sanpete County, Utah. Defendants, Clarence 0. Kelsch and Rhoda Mae Kelsch, hereafter Kelsch, counterclaimed seeking to quiet title to a portion of real property Neeley claims. Defendants Conovers and Ottosens appeared at the time of the trial, but asserted no evidence or claims adverse to Neeley. They claimed no interest in the disputed land and did not join in this appeal.
The district court entered judgment in favor of Kelsch, which quieted title in them. We reverse, and remand…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- LeBaron v. CrismonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. DudleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Turner v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Jensen v. Manila Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Hall v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Mabey v. Kay Peterson Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
- Bown v. LovelandUtah Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.