Legal Opinion

Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1992No. 91SC349PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

We granted certiorari to review State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cung *1008La, 819 P.2d 537 (Colo.App.1991) (State Farm). The issue before us centers on the interpretation of a State Farm automobile liability policy and the uninsured and no fault provisions in that policy. The petitioner, Cung La, was driving a white 1984 Mustang that was insured by State Farm when he was intentionally shot by a passenger in an uninsured motor vehicle. The court of appeals held that under the uninsured or no fault provision of the State Farm policy the petitioner did not sustain an injury from the use or…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Detweiler v. J. C. Penney Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kral v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Nelson v. ElwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Brooke v. Restaurant Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Horrell v. Department of AdministrationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API