Legal Opinion

Wendell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1999No. 97-393PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 William E. Wendell (Appellant) appeals from the judgment entered by the Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County, on its order granting summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile *142Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Companies, and State Farm Insurance Companies (collectively State Farm). Oral argument was held on June 18, 1998.

¶2 The sole issue presented for review is whether the District Court erred in holding that Appellant was not entitled to uninsured motorist (UM) benefits because his injuries were not “caused by an accident arising out of the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Modroo v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Giacomelli v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Newman v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API