Legal Opinion
Professional Engineers in California Government v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1980No. Civ. 57276PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
This appeal is from the issuance of a supplemental writ of mandate resulting from a contempt proceeding (pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 1097) commenced by petitioner, respondent Professional Engineers in California Government (hereinafter PECG), against appellant the California State Personnel Board (hereinafter Board), for its alleged failure to comply with a 1976 writ of mandate.
The history of this action dates back to 1974. In that year PECG obtained a declaratory relief judgment against the Board construing the duties of the latter under Government Code…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Talmo v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Eureka Teachers Assn. v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- California Labor Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Standards BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.