California Labor Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, J.
We are called upon here to determine the constitutionality of provisions of the state Budget Act which purport to limit the amounts the state will pay towards a certain category of attorney fee awards against state agencies. We conclude that the challenged provisions violate the single subject rule set forth in section 9 of article IV of the California Constitution, and are therefore void.
I. Background
Petitioners brought this original proceeding for a writ of mandate compelling respondent California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to incorporate in the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Cerritos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- US Ecology, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Los Angeles International Charter High School v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.