Faske v. Radbill
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This case arises on three motions: '(1) defendants’ motion for a more definite statement and for a bill of particulars; (2) plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ motion for a more definite statement and for a bill of particulars, and (3) defendants’ motion for an order extending the time for filing an answer to the complaint.
The complaint alleges that plaintiffs entered into an oral contract with defendants whereby defendants designated plaintiffs as sole and exclusive distributors for defendants’ products for the State of Michigan, in consideration of plaintiff Faske…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brinley v. LewisDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Brockway Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
- Blanton v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1944
- Nordman v. Johnson CityDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1939
- Van Dyke v. BroadhurstDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Angel Creek Logging Co. v. Atlas Plywood Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1957
- Syan Holding Corp. v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Just Construction, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021