Legal Opinion
Brinley v. Lewis
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 1, 1939No. 111PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALBERT L. WATSON, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendant, under the provisions of Rule 12, subsections (e) and (f) of the New Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for a more definite statement and to strike off part of the complaint. The motion consists of three requests for a more definite statement and a request to strike a paragraph from the complaint on the ground that it is redundant and immaterial.
The defendant urges that the plaintiff be required to furnish a more definite statement as to which of the injuries alleged are permanent; a more definite…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American La France-Foamite Corporation v. American Oil Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
- Fried v. Warner Bros. Circuit Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Southern Grocery Stores, Inc. v. Zoller Brewing Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1939
3Cited by34 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1940
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.