Van Dyke v. Broadhurst
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ALBERT L. WATSON, District Judge.
This case is now before the Court for determination of plaintiff’s motion for a more definite statement of defendant’s counterclaim.
This Court had occasion to consider the counter-claim in connection with a motion for judgment thereon filed by the plaintiff. The principal ground for the motion for judgment was the failure of the defendant to allege certain particulars which are now the subject of this motion for a more definite statement. The Court is of the opinion that certain of these particulars should be supplied by the defendant in his counterclaim…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Faske v. RadbillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946
- Philadelphia Retail Jewelers Ass'n v. L. & C. Mayers Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941