Brockway Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
Rule 12(e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, has been and is certain to be a source of much labor for the courts. It will be made less onerous if the courts, as they should, strictly construe the rule as applicable only to particulars sufficiently definite to enable a party to prepare a responsive pleading and construe “preparation for trial” as comprehended in the words “to prepare his responsive pleading.” That clearly was the intent as respects a motion for a bill of particulars. If the party is fully advised of the meaning of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Poole v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1941
- Brown v. Fire Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Steingut v. Guaranty Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Faske v. RadbillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.