Nordman v. Johnson City
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
WHAM, District Judge.
The case comes before the court upon plaintiff’s motion to strike certain portions of the defendant’s answer to the amended complaint and, particularly, paragraphs 5, 7, 14, 22 and 23 of said answer and strike affirmative defenses Nos. 1, 2 and 3, as contained in said answer.
The motion to strike the answer and paragraphs 5, 7, 14, 22 and 23 thereof will be denied. In so far as the answer and the said paragraphs thereof may set forth invalid defenses, such questions may be passed upon when disposition is made of the case upon its merits. With reference to the paragraphs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Quincy v. KemperIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Bank of Burlington v. City of MurphysboroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Faske v. RadbillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946
- Stroh v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- ter Haar v. Seaboard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1940
- Philadelphia Retail Jewelers Ass'n v. L. & C. Mayers Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Stroh v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978