Legal Opinion

Ruhd v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2004No. 03-504PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶1 Appellants/Intervenors, Fisch, Frost, and Rausch, and their respective counsel, Mr. Monte Beck, Mr. Stephen Roberts, and Mr. Lon Dale, appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) that the attorneys’ fees common fund created via the litigation entitled Rausch v. State Compensation Insurance Fund, 2002 MT 203, 311 Mont. 210, 54 P.3d 25, was limited solely to claimants insured by the State Fund. The Workers’ Compensation Court bifurcated the issue of common fund attorneys’ fees from the other issues in the case and certified it for appeal.

¶2 We state the issues on appeal as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vincent v. Hughes Air West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Means v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Rausch v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Rausch v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Thompson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Stavenjord v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Schmill v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API