Legal Opinion

Rausch v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2002No. 01-420, 01-441 & 01-442PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

¶1 Appellants, Alexis Rausch (as conservator for Kevin Rausch), Charles Fisch, and Thomas Frost, each filed separate petitions in Workers' Compensation Court claiming entitlement to immediate payment of an impairment award based on their respective impairment ratings. Respondent, State Compensation Insurance Fund, denied immediate payment of the impairment awards, asserting that the benefit was not due until each claimant reached his retirement age. Appellants brought their claims as individuals and on behalf of others similarly situated, and also sought attorney fees, penalties, and common…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lovell v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Schuman v. BestromMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Murer v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rausch v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hiett v. Missoula County Public SchoolsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ravalli County v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Geiger v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Stavenjord v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API