Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2007No. DA 06-0365PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Lee Thompson, Darin Sharp, and Scott Bailey (collectively, “the Workers”) each filed claims in the Workers’ Compensation Court (‘WCC”) for workers’ compensation benefits. In a separate action, the Workers jointly filed a Petition for Declaratory Judgment in the WCC, naming the State of Montana (“State”) as the sole respondent. They sought a declaration stating that the claimant disclosure procedures, specifically the claimant disclosure waiver provisions set forth in §§ 39-*51371-604(3) and 50-16-527(5), MCA (2003)1 violated their state constitutional right to privacy and deprived them of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Stanley v. LemireMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wunderlich v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re the Marriage of MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. TweedyMontana Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Estate of Big SpringMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rimrock Chrysler, Inc. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re Declaratory Ruling re SDCL 62-1-1(6)South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API