Legal Opinion

Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Hall

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2001No. 00-749PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Martin and Carolyn Kilmer (Kilmers) appeal from an order issued by the Seventh Judicial District Court, Richland County, granting Medcenter One, Inc.’s (Medcenter) motion for partial summary judgment. The District Court’s order precluded Kilmers from recovering Medcenter’s alleged pro rata share of attorney fees from a settlement fund subject to Medcenter’s hen. We reverse and remand.

¶2 We restate the sole issue on appeal as follows:

Does our opinion in Sisters of Charity v. Nichols preclude application of the common fund doctrine to the case at bar?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. KitzmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Foy v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Goodover v. Lindey's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Trustees of Indiana University v. BuxbaumMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Riordan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrewerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Martin v. SAIF Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API