Legal Opinion
Saunders v. McKee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 9, 1936No. 24773PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
On the 13th day of June, 1931, plaintiff filed his action against the Tri-State Supply Company, W. G. Saunders, Ed Saunders, and Bert Saunders to recover upon an account. The Tri-State Supply Company is a fictitious or trade-name and it afterwards developed that W. G. Saunders was the sole owner of the same. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff in the sum of $601.95, the amount prayed for in the petition of the plaintiff. The court included in its judgment rendered upon said verdict interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 1st day of January, 1927. The plaintiff prayed for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Conner v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Commonwealth Cotton Oil Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Clarence L. Boyd Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- City of Mangum v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Jones v. CabanissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Howlett v. Mayo's IncorporatedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Klein v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.