Legal Opinion

Jones v. Cabaniss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1939No. 28686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The district court of Custer county, entered a money judgment upon a verdict against plaintiff in error and de creed a lien therefor against the interest of plaintiff in error in certain real property owned equally by plaintiff in error and defendant in error. This appeal is from that judgment. The parties are hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff Cabaniss and defendant Jones, in June, 1927, agreed in writing that Caba-niss erect a certain building and sell to Jones a half interest therein and that Jones pay Cabaniss half of the cost thereof. Jones was also to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wayne Tank & Pump Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Standard Fashion Co. v. JoelsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Jones v. El Reno Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Remund v. Liberty Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Saunders v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Porter v. ManesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Dick v. EssarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Jones v. CabanissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Selected Investments Corp. v. Spencer-SedbrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Oklahoma Preferred Finance & Loan Corp. v. MorrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API