Conner v. Bank of Bakersfield
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. Wiley and Wiley & Lambert for Appellant and Respondent The Bank of Bakersfield. Peter A. Breen and C. C. Cowgill for Respondent and Appellant Sarah L. Conner, Executrix, etc.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
On July 21, 1910, defendant, The Bank of Bakersfield, certified a check in the sum of $3,799.66, drawn by G. J. Plantz and payable to the Kern Valley Bank. Plantz then delivered the check to the Kern Valley Bank for the account of C. L. Conner. Conner died a short time thereafter and plaintiff herein was appointed executrix of his will. On May 19, 1911, plaintiff presented said check to The Bank of Bakersfield, which refused payment. On July 20, 1911, this bank commenced an action in interpleader requesting that said éxecutrix and Plantz be required to set out their conflicting claims to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bingham v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- San Francisco Savings Union v. E. B. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Conner v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Green v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- O'CONNELL v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- City of Morgan Hill v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Rabinowitch v. Cal. Western Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- McConnell v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.