Thomson v. City of Lewiston
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Chief Justice.
I
NATURE OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from the district judge’s dismissal based on lack of standing, of Appellant Brent Thomson’s (Thomson) complaint seeking a declaratory judgment invalidating the City of Lewiston’s (City) creation of an urban renewal plan (Plan) pursuant to Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code. We affirm.
II
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 18, 1999, the City adopted Resolution No. 99-75, which found that deteriorated or deteriorating conditions existed within the City that were in need of rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment. The Resolution…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- William v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Badell v. BeeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- P.O. Ventures, Inc. v. Loucks Family Irrevocable TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SchwartzIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Ameritel Inns, Inc. v. Greater Boise Auditorium DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Philip Morris, R.J. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.