Legal Opinion
William v. Cenarrusa
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1984No. 15201PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTLEY, Justice.
This appeal from a district court judgment ordering reapportionment of the Idaho legislature is the sequel to Hellar v. Cenarrusa, 104 Idaho 858, 664 P.2d 765 (1983) (Hellar I). In Hellar I the district court had held that the reapportionment scheme of House Bill 830 of the second session of the Forty-Fifth Legislature (codified as I.C. § 67-202) violated art. 3, § 5 of the Idaho Constitution. That section provides that a “senatorial or representative District, when more than one county shall constitute the same, shall be composed of contiguous counties, and no county shall…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Mahan v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Nottingdale Homeowners' Ass'n v. DarbyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Terrazas v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Smith v. MittonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.