Legal Opinion

Badell v. Beeks

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1988No. 16821PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

This case against attorney Paul Beeks was the aftermath of an unsuccessful malpractice action against a dentist, Michael Badell, which Mr. Beeks brought on behalf of the dentist’s patient, one Vaughn Hicks. In a summary judgment hearing, Dr. Ba-dell sought dismissal on the basis that Hicks had failed to establish the applicable standard of care in malpractice actions, citing I.C. § 6-1012, through an expert witness. The district court, the Hon. Phillip M. Becker agreed, but denied Dr. Badell’s motion on the condition Hicks supply such expert testimony within five weeks.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Martin v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Bickel v. MacKieDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1978
  4. Bull v. McCuskeyNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Bird v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Zamos v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API