Legal Opinion

State v. Schwartz

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2003No. 29359PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court holding that because the defendant did not at all times comply with the terms and conditions of his probation in this case, the district court did not have authority to reduce the defendant’s charge to a misdemeanor pursuant to Idaho Code § 19-2604(2). We affirm the order of the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

After pleading guilty to a felony offense of driving while under the influence of alcohol, the appellant Mathew Schwartz was sentenced on April 28, 1993. The district court granted Schwartz a withheld…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jen-Rath Co. v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lopez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Carrier v. Lake Pend Oreille School District 84Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API