Watt v. Copeland
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON, P. J., pro tem.
Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to an undivided one-half interest in a tract of land situate near the town of Sonoma, in Sonoma County, and also to cancel a deed made in 1923 by Sarah Ellen Watt, as grantor, to defendant Octavia Copeland, as grantee.
The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and judgment was rendered quieting the title of defendant Octavia Copeland in and to said undivided one-half interest in said land, and canceling a deed made in 1911 by Sarah Ellen Watt, as grantor, to plaintiff, Richard L. Watt, as grantee. From this…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brock v. FouchyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Dinneen v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Cordi v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bixby v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Keating v. Basich Bros. Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.