Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Coschina.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1901No. S.F. No. 1769PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to recover of defendant Coschina as constable, and the other defendants as sureties on his official bond, a certain stock of cigars, goods, and fixtures in a cigar-store at No. 116 West Santa Clara Street, in the city of San José, or in case a delivery cannot be had, the value thereof, with damages for the detention. The case was tried with a jury, and a verdict returned for plaintiff, fixing the value of the property at $315, and the damages to plaintiff by reason of the taking at $140. Judgment was accordingly entered. Defendants made a motion for a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. McKibbenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Tucker v. HagertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API