Exotex Corp. v. Rinehart
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
In this case, we hold that a default judgment entered by a clerk of court pursuant to W.R.C.P. 55(b)(1) is void when the theories of recovery that are pleaded do not permit a conclusion that the plaintiff's claim "is for a sum certain, or for a sum which can by *828computation be made certain." The district court denied a motion to set aside the default judgment entered by the clerk of court, A district court has no discretion to refuse to set aside a void judgment upon application for that relief, and we reverse the Order Denying Defendants' Motions. The case is remanded to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Poinsettia Dairy Products, Inc. v. the Wessel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Sandstrom v. SandstromWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Mount Ida School for Girls v. RoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Lawrence-Allison & Associates West, Inc. v. ArcherWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Horn v. WoosterWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Rocio Esmeralda Mercado Soto Linch v. Ronald B. LinchWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Downs v. Homax Oil Sales, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Bryden v. LAKESIDE VENTURES, LLC.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Exotex Corp. v. RinehartWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.