Legal Opinion

Downs v. Homax Oil Sales, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2018No. S-17-0224PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUTZ, Justice.

[¶1] Appellee Homax Oil Sales, Inc. filed suit against Appellant Robert W. Downs, claiming he and his daughter had improperly interfered with Homax's business relationship with RKI Exploration & Production. After a bench trial, the district court granted judgment in favor of Homax.

[¶2] On appeal, Mr. Downs claims the district court abused its discretion by allowing Homax to present damages evidence that was not properly disclosed during discovery and improperly awarded damages to Homax. We conclude Homax violated its duty under W.R.C.P. 26 to provide its computation of damages…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gates v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Fremont Homes, Inc. v. ElmerWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tyler R. Kimzey v. Shelby K. KimzeyWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Rammell v. Mountainaire Animal Clinic, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Janet G. Peterson v. Meritain Health, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Aubri Vahai v. Ryan GertschWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Jared Eaton Dutka v. Emily Rene-Elizabeth DutkaWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API