Legal Opinion

Exotex Corp. v. Rinehart

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2000No. 97-234Published

1Opinion of the Court

3 P.3d 826 (2000)

EXOTEX CORP., a Nevada corporation, Appellant (Defendant),

v.

James H. RINEHART, d/b/a Western United Realty, Appellee (Plaintiff).

No. 97-234.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

April 5, 2000.

Representing Appellant: Douglas W. Weaver, Wheatland, Wyoming.

Representing Appellee: Kevin D. Huber of Huber Law Offices, P.C., Laramie, Wyoming.

Before LEHMAN, C.J., and THOMAS, MACY, GOLDEN, and TAYLOR,[*] JJ.

THOMAS, Justice.

In this case, we hold that a default judgment entered by a clerk of court pursuant to W.R.C.P. 55(b)(1) is void when the theories of recovery that are pleaded do not permit a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Poinsettia Dairy Products, Inc. v. the Wessel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. U.S. Aviation, Inc. v. Wyoming Avionics, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Sandstrom v. SandstromWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API