Legal Opinion

Horn v. Wooster

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2007No. 06-195PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[1 1] The federal district court for the District of Wyoming certified two questions to this Court concerning how a negligent attorney's contingency fee in the underlying personal injury action should be accounted for in a subsequent malpractice award to his former client. We conclude that, consistent with our damages jurisprudence in other areas of the law, a malpractice plaintiff is entitled to an award in the net amount he would have received under the contingent fee agreement had the underlying action been successful. We decline, however, to recognize a cause of action by an…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan Greenberg, Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bartle v. BerryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  3. Pamela Sue Hook v. Tito Trevino, Individually, and Tito Trevino D/B/A Trevino Law OfficesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Schlinger v. McGheeWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Sorensen v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API