Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Hillcrest Medical Center, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1956No. 36669PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

Defendant in error, Hillcrest Medical Center, Inc., brought this action against the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, to recover for hospital and medical services to prisoners of the City of Tulsa who were brought to its hospital by members of the Tulsa Police Department.

The City of Tulsa brings this appeal to reverse the judgment rendered against it. The parties will be given their trial court designations.

This action was filed on June 10, 1953, for hospital and medical services rendered during the fiscal year 1952-1953.

The testimony shows that the City had in its employ a doctor who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Sawyer v. County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
  3. City of Tulsa v. SislerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Windham Community Memorial Hospital v. City of WillimanticSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  2. Hillcrest Medical Center v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. HCA Health Services of Oklahoma, Inc. v. WhetselSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety ex rel. Oklahoma Highway Patrol DepartmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API