Legal Opinion

Edward Thompson Co. v. Bristow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1926No. 16436PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the court below.

The proceeding in the county court was to revive a dormant judgment. The judgment was procured by plaintiff against defendant in the county court of Caddo county on the 26th, day of November, 1917. An execution was issued against the defendant on the 5th day of February, 1919, and returned unsatisfied. On the 3rd day of February, 1925, the plaintiff filed in the ease a motion to revive the judgment, and served notice on the defendant on the same day, fixing February…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. YarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Hill v. PersingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Reaves & Co. v. J. A. Long & BrotherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Tefft v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. Sneary v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bartlett Mortgage Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. LandessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Thomos v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Jersak v. Risen, Ex'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Tucker v. GautierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API