Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bigham v. Powers

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1911PublishedCited by 20 opinions

PROM GIBSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of G-ibson County.— Colin P. McKinney, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Me.. Justice Geeen

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a mandamus suit, brought in the chancery-court of Gibson county, to compel the county judge of that county to issue a warrant to pay for certain preliminary expenses incurred in connection with the proposed formation of a drainage district. This expenditure was authorized by the Gibson county quarterly court, under the authority of chapter 185 of the Acts of 1909.

The resolution appropriated $2500 out of the general county fund for the purpose, and directed the county judge to draw warrants for said expenses, which he refused to do.

A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Astor v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Arnold v. Mayor of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Harbison v. Knoxville Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Prescott v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Palmer v. Southern Express Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Quinn v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Crewse v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ragsdale v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API