Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Mayor of Knoxville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 52 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— Joseph W. Sneed, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

*198This cause questions the constitutionality of chapter 278, p. 585, of the Acts of 1905.

The act, in substance, provides for the creation of improvement districts in the city of Knoxville, and the payment of the expenses incurred thereby for public improvements by special assessments on abutting property.

The caption of the act, which sets out its purpose, is as follows:

“An act to provide for the creation of improvement districts for the purpose of opening, widening, extending, grading, curbing, guttering, paving, gravelling, macadamizing, parking, laying permanent sewers on, upon, or in any…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Louisiana v. PilsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1882

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Michelle RYE Et Al. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Clark D. Frazier v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Prall v. BurckharttIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State of Tennessee v. Kenneth McCormickTennessee Supreme Court · 2016

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API