Legal Opinion

Crewse v. Beeler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1948PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

The two questions for determination áre whether Chapter's 367 and 671, respectively, Private Acts of 1947 are vaiid enactments. These acts are applicable only to Polk County. The Chancellor adjudged each to be constitutional in all particulars. Complainants below by appropriate assignments of error in support of their appeal insist that each act is unconstitutional for any one of séverál reasons stated.

Chapter 367 is voluminous. It purports to create a three member board of County Commissioners and to transfer from the Quarterly County Court to this Board the administration of all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prescott v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Southern v. Beeler, Atty.-Gen.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Palmer v. Southern Express Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Town of McMinnville v. CurtisTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State ex rel. Bigham v. PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bailey v. KainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Weaver v. AyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Donathan v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Tasco Developing and Building Corporation v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Witt v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API