Legal Opinion

People v. Whisby

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1979PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*836OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendants’ contention that they have been denied their right to a speedy trial (US Const, 6th, 14th Arndts; CPL 30.20; Civil Rights Law, § 12) may not be considered by this court where defendants failed to raise the issue at trial. (People v Primmer, 46 NY2d 1048; People v Adams, 38 NY2d 605.)

We also reject the contention of each of the defendants that the in-court identification by the victim ought to have been suppressed. With respect to defendant Price, it need only be stated that there is evidence in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. PrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. BurrowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. JordanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API