People v. Whisby
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*836OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendants’ contention that they have been denied their right to a speedy trial (US Const, 6th, 14th Arndts; CPL 30.20; Civil Rights Law, § 12) may not be considered by this court where defendants failed to raise the issue at trial. (People v Primmer, 46 NY2d 1048; People v Adams, 38 NY2d 605.)
We also reject the contention of each of the defendants that the in-court identification by the victim ought to have been suppressed. With respect to defendant Price, it need only be stated that there is evidence in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. PrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BurrowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. JordanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.