People v. Malloy
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Cooke.
The obligation of the trial court to advise the jury on the law includes the duty to respond meaningfully to requests for further instructions, which may require asking the jury to be more specific about their difficulty. Where, however, after considerable deliberation, the jury requests clarification concerning the meaning of reasonable doubt and the original instruction is adequate, it is not error for the Trial Judge, as he did here, to respond to the request by rereading that instruction. Nor can it be said on this record that the witnesses’ in-court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by444 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
439 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.