Legal Opinion
People v. Primmer
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1979PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1049OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant claims that he was denied his right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution in that he was not afforded a speedy trial within 180 days of his notification to the District Attorney that he was imprisoned in Texas (CPL 580.20). It is conceded, however, that he first raised his alleged deprivation at the Appellate Division; "and, not having raised the issue in the court of first instance, there is no error to be reviewed” (People v Adams, 38 NY2d 605,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by31 opinions
- McClung v. Marion County CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. WhisbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nash v. JeffesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Engblom v. CareyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.