Legal Opinion
People v. Jordan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1984PublishedCited by 53 opinions
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*826On this direct appeal from his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, defendant seeks dismissal of the indictment against him on the grounds that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial (incorporated in CPL 30.20) and that the People were not ready for trial within the time prescribed by statute (CPL 30.30). Neither of these claims was advanced in the criminal action before or at trial (CPL 210.45) although they were raised and rejected on defendant’s pretrial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. WhisbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Salesian Society, Inc. v. Village of EllenvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by53 opinions
- People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. DenisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BeyorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. AlgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.